![]() ![]() OTE’s 2004 Annual Report ( here) contains information similar to that noted above and states as follows. The Greek State is represented by the Minister of Finance who is entitled to intervene according to the Articles of Association and the legal procedures as any other shareholder can do. The Greek State may – only as a shareholder – monitor the operation and administration of the corporate affairs. ![]() “The Greek State may no longer control OTE in a way different from that of any other Societe Anonyme company or telecom services provider. The report notes that OTE’s shares have traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 1998. OTE’s 2003 Annual Report ( here) notes that the “Greek State” stake of total share capital was approximately 33.7%. Just what type of entity was OTE during this time period? The conduct at issue in the Comverse enforcement took place between 2003-2006. See, e.g., Miller & Chevalier FCPA Review Spring 2011 ( here) (“Neither the SEC nor the DOJ identifies OTE as a government instrumentality, although the language used (identifying the Greek government as the largest single shareholder but not majority owner) suggests that they would have brought anti-bribery charges if there was evidence that CTI had knowledge of the payments or that Comverse Limited engaged in improper activity in the United States.”). a “charge” that does not have a “foreign official” element) you can be sure that this enforcement action, notwithstanding the manner of resolution, was still very much about the “foreign officials” allegedly at issue. – a telecommunications provider controlled and partially owned by the Greek Government” including “employees of OTE’s subsidiaries Cosmote, Cosmofon, and Cosmorom, in order to obtain purchase orders from those companies.”Īccording to the NPA, “the Greek Government was OTE’s largest single shareholder and maintained an interest in over one-third of OTE’s issued share capital.”Īlthough the NPA only referenced knowing violations of the FCPA’s books and records provisions (i.e. The recent Comverse enforcement ( here) focused on “individuals connected to” “Hellenic Telecommunications Organization S.A. The limbo bar apparently has been lowered. See this prior post regarding the Alcatel-Lucent enforcement action and Telekom Malaysia Berhad – a commercial enterprise with a shareholder base of approximately 35,000 institutional and private/retail shareholders. The previous “limbo low” for an otherwise commercial enterprise to be deemed an “instrumentality” of a foreign government, and thus employees of the enterprise to be deemed “foreign officials” by the DOJ and SEC was 43%. It’s Friday, so let’s get this started with some music. By Mike Koehler on Apin Comverse Technology, Foreign Official, Greece ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |